Selection of the best investment decision in San Luis Potosithrough Multicriteria Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19136/hitos.a30n87.6337Keywords:
Opciones de decisión, Criterios de decisión, Modelos multicriterio, Matriz de decisión.Abstract
Objective: Choose the best option among 5, under 10 decision criteria, to make an investment in the city of San Luis Potosi using 4 multi-criteria decision models.
Material y Methods: The weighting of the decision criteria weights has been carried out with Saaty's Analytic Hierarchical Process and the multi-criteria decision models applied have been Moora, Topsis, Electre and Smart, which were used to classify the 5 decision options and see which of them is the best.
Results: The models did not agree regarding the best decision, since the first two give the investment in García Diego as the best decision, while the remaining two choose Torre Diamante.
Conclusions: Even though there is no coincidence of the 4 models applied, it is obvious that the two best decision options are García Diego and Torre Diamante. This is an advantage that multi-criteria models provide over traditional project evaluation methods, which only consider quantitative aspects to choose the best project. With multi-criteria models, qualitative criteria are also included that take into account the preferences of the decision-maker and arrive at a better decision.
Downloads
References
Brauers, W. K. y Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445-469. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228345226_The_MOORA_method_and_its_application_to_privatization_in_a_transition_economy
Data México (2024). Servicios Inmobiliarios y de Alquiler de Bienes Muebles e Intangibles. Publicado por el Gobierno de México. https://www.economia.gob.mx/datamexico/es/profile/industry/real-estate-and-rental-and-leasing#:~:text=En%20el%20primer%20trimestre%20de%202024%2C%20Servicios%20Inmobiliarios%20y%20de,mismo%20periodo%20del%20a%C3%B1o%20anterior.
Edwards, W. (1977). How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(5), 326-340. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720.
Aranda, D. (18 de enero de 2019). SLP, ciudad número 15 con una mayor plusvalía. El Sol de San Luis. https://www.elsoldesanluis.com.mx/local/slp-ciudad-numero-15-con-una-mayor-plusvalia-2937562.html#!.
Hernández, N. L. (5 de noviembre de 2022). Estos son los sitios más exclusivos para vivir en la capital de SLP, según AMPI. El Universal San Luis Potosí. https://sanluis.eluniversal.com.mx/economia-y-negocios/estos-son-los-sitios-mas-exclusivos-para-vivir-en-la-capital-de-slp-segun-ampi/.
García-Cascales, M. S., Lamata, M. T., y Sánchez-Lozano, J. M. (2011). Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multicriteria decision making process. Annals of Operations Research, 199(1), 373-391. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v199y2012i1p373-39110.1007-s10479-011-1009-x.html
Hwang, C. L. y Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag.
Izar-Landeta, J. M. (2022). Modelos de decisión multicriterio en el ámbito administrativo. Instituto Mexicano de Contadores Públicos.
Lamudi (2024). Reporte Inmobiliario 2023. Lamudi. https://www.lamudi.com.mx/journal/reporte-inmobiliario-mexico-2023/.
Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE). Revue Française d´Automatique d´Informatique et de Recherché Opérationnelle, Recherche Opérationnelle, 2(6), 57-75. http://www.numdam.org/item/RO_1968__2_1_57_0.pdf
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mc Graw Hill.
SHF. (2024). Índice SHF de precios de la vivienda en México, cuarto trimestre de 2023. Gobierno de México. https://www.gob.mx/shf/es/articulos/indice-shf-de-precios-de-la-vivienda-en-mexico-cuarto-trimestre-de-2023.
Wang, Y. M., y Luo, Y. (2009). On Rank reversal in decision analysis. Mathematical and Computing Modelling, 49(5-6), 1221-1229. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717708002860
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw Hill.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
As a requirement for the manuscript, the author is requested to provide the Copyright Assignment Letter, so that the Journal has the publication rights and to avoid plagiarism.
PLAGIARISM POLICIES
The Editorial Board of the Journal HITOS DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICO ADMINISTRAIVAS has the authority to reject in the review process any manuscript that does not have adequate citation in the documents consulted in its scientific research work, which can be considered as plagiarism behaviors. Likewise, the referees carry out the plagiarism review using specialized software, such as iThenticate, among others.
COPYRIGHT POLICIES
Authors who have publications in the journal accept the following terms: • At the time the manuscript is accepted, the author transfers the copyright to the Journal HITOS DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICO ADMINISTRATIVAS.
- The authors may make additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their research work on the Internet (eg, institutional or personal files), which would allow more beneficial exchanges to increase the citation of the published work.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
How to Cite
